Search for: "GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al"
Results 341 - 360
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Chamber of Commerce et al. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
As the certification was provisional and preliminary to final approval, denial of final approval abrogates provisional class certification and the interim appointment of Kamber et al as class counsel. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:37 am
LEONA FORKEY, et al., DefendantsCase No.: 2:09-cv-00462-GMN-GWFUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADADecember 29, 2010, Decided 2010 U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
Motorola et al (CAFC 2010-1266) precedential The winning argument at district court was that six companies "each have the right to grant licenses to the patents in the field of Wireless Handsets. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
Miesch, et al., No. 05-1076 (DB). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Blizzard (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (WIRED) (Ars Technica) US – IV files patent suits against nine companies – Intellectual Ventures v Altera et al; Intellectual Ventures v Check Point Software et al; Intellectual Ventures v Hynix et al(Patently-O) (IAM) (IAM) (IPBiz) (271 Patent Blog) (PatLit) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
Artesyn Technologies, Inc., et al. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm
” This Court has previously expressed skepticism about that doctrine; Rosetta cannot rely on that concept to hold Google liable here. ______ The case library: * Public Citizen amicus brief in support of Google. * Public Knowledge/EFF amicus brief in support of Google. * eBay/Yahoo amicus brief in support of Google. * Google's opening response brief. * UK Intellectual Property Law Society amicus brief in support of neither party. * Rosetta Stone's opening appellate brief: redacted… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
Artesyn Technologies, Inc., et al. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Candelaria, et al.) [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
s digital lock rules (Michael Geist) ‘When copyright Bill C-32 passes, I will automatically become a criminal’ – digital locks (Michael Geist) Business method patents: The state of the art after the Amazon.com decision (IP Osgoode) Chile Heroic victory for action figures – dispute over transformers.cl (IP tango) Europe CJEU considers ‘logistical hub’ for fakes in Nokia hearing: C-495/09 (Class 46) (IPKat) (Afro-IP) EFF calls on European Commission to protect… [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:18 am
" Data Retrieval Technology LLC et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
AOL, LLC. et al., 2-07-cv-00555 (TXED) (Ward, J.). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
Had Google gotten their way, Viacom would have had to join forces with Premier League et al to file one appeal brief. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
However, in January 2010, the constitutionality of Section 203 was challenged by the Harvard Professor Guhan Subramanian et al. in his paper “Is Delaware’s Antitakeover Statute Unconstitutional? [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
American Express Co. et al. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
ARMIGER, Appellant, v. [read post]
