Search for: "GRANT v. ROBERT et al" Results 341 - 360 of 725
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 8:09 pm by Robert Tanha
Because the plant manager had not personally, that is had not in his own dealings with the Applicant, discriminated against him, he could not be held liable under the Code for the actions of the employer, even if those actions were themselves discriminatory.PROCEDURAL RULINGSEllis et al v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
Sand Creek, Inc., et al. - more coming Bruce Carr v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Questions aimed at attorneys seemed to be more of the devil's advocate variety, with justices not tipping their hands on their inclinations.The Court summarized the issues in the case:Defendants-Appellants C&J Coupe Family Limited Partnership, Robert Nigel Richards, Trustee under the Marilyn Sue Wilson Trust, Miles Hugh Wilson, et al., appeal from (1) the denial of their motion for damages pursuant to Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 101-27 in… [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
City of Akron, et al    Northern District of Ohio at Akron 08a0260n.06 B & V Distr Co Inc v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Facebook, Netflix, et al.: An important goal of the patent system is to encourage innovation without disrupting other-innovation through mistaken government “grants of monopolies. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am by Ben
Vita Tkach et al, in the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
State of Indiana , a 15-page opinion, Judge Vaidik writes:Following re-trial, Robert D. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:09 am
Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.In Plaza Group Properties, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
Indiana Dept. of Correction, et al., a 7-page opinion, Sr. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm by Brett Trout
While the Supreme Court takes very few patent cases, if any case has the chops to make it to the bigs, Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Winn, et al. (09-991), which the Court also granted. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:05 am by Mary Zambreno
Hodges, et al., the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution guaranteed the right of same-sex couples to marry and requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out of state. [read post]