Search for: "Gaines v. Unknown"
Results 341 - 360
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm
Lawfare is a fascinating term—albeit mostly unknown in the Canadian legal lexicon. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Best wishes,Whether this writer would follow or relax his or her future deadlines is unknown and irrelevant. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
The S&H Nadlan Case In S&H Nadlan, LLC v MLK Associates, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 30523(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 7, 2016], Justice Donna M. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The immediate impact of the ruling is unknown. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
It's statistically a truism that they gain the greatest percentage boost by an added $15K in compensation, and the additional money puts yet more yardage between starting out in BigLaw as opposed to pro bono, government, or SmallLaw. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:42 am
”12 Consistent with the policy considerations identified by the ABA, the NHBA Ethics Committee explained that Rule 5.6(b)’s bar on such direct restrictions “protects the rights of as-yet unknown claimants by preventing defense counsel from buying off plaintiff’s counsel, thus ensuring that settlement agreements do not reduce the pool of experienced attorneys available to the public. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm
This untoward, anti-Congressional-intent result is only the more indefensible when one considers the nature of the red flags themselves, all of which -- or nearly all of which – were generally unknown to the small investor, but many of which -- sometimes most or all of which -- were known to the large institutions or investors whose cases have been brought to the District Court for the Southern District by withdrawals of references. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm
The duty sits alongside the hosting protection in the eCommerce Directive, but cast as a positive obligation to remove in-scope illegal content upon gaining awareness of the presence of illegal content, rather than (as in the eCommerce Directive) exposing the provider to potential liability under the relevant substantive law. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 2:54 am
Pell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 2:04 am
Truth versus Protection of Journalist Sources: the Canadian Supreme Court The Canadian Supreme Court case of R v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Lakshmanan Fireworks Industries v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Alan Gover. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
