Search for: "Gallagher v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm
Gallagher, Bennett L. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
The one time it came before for the Court was in Gallagher v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:12 am
KaplinskyIt is looking like our prediction that Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
At the opening of this Term, it granted review of United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
Gallagher, 13-42). [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Such was the holding of the Fourth Department in its September 27, 2013 decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Woollard v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
Gallagher, 712 F.3d 865 (4th Cir. 2013); People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Facts of the Case Here are the facts of Cook v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:18 am
(our report here) states in no uncertain terms that the common law position is that a landlord’s notice to quit is irrevocable once served.30. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:18 am
(our report here) states in no uncertain terms that the common law position is that a landlord’s notice to quit is irrevocable once served.30. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm
See Gallagher Basset Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:10 am
Law v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm
Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:22 pm
Here he is (in front, red/pink shirt) at age 17 visiting with State Rep. [read post]
