Search for: "Garrett v. Garrett"
Results 341 - 360
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
First up is Turner v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:55 am
Resolving Juror Confusion New York’s Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:29 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Buck v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Recognizing how narrowly the order defines sanctuary jurisdictions is helpful in avoiding unnecessary rabbit holes, like the recurring suggestion that, for purposes of fighting Trump’s executive order, the § 1983 Third Circuit case Galarza v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am
On Monday, the court issued an opinion in Beckles v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent case, San Francisco v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:20 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 2:27 pm
Real property — Dormant Mineral Interests Act — Transfer of vested property rights This case arises from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Garrett County, terminating appellants’ dormant mineral interests and merging them into appellees’ surface estates. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In Mullenix v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that the case, along with Jennings v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
LEXIS 2526 (ND IL, Jan. 5, 2017), an Illinois federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim that his placement in segregation in violation of his due process rights resulted in restrictions on his ability to practice his Roman Catholic religion.In Garrett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:25 am
In late December, Modisette v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am
First up is Nelson v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm
Still Seeking Contraceptive Compromise After Zubik v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:34 am
Scott Garrett (R-NJ), who gave what may be his last floor speech, said the package contains bipartisan provisions that build upon the “measurable success” of the JOBS Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Additional coverage comes from Garrett Epps in The Atlantic, who observes that over the years since Baker v. [read post]
