Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)" Results 341 - 360 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am by Steve McConnell
Plaintiff became a plaintiff when he sued people (including a state policeman, the Illinois Attorney General, and other Prison Review Board members) whom he claimed had conspired to prosecute him wrongfully. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Don't believe me on this one; ask Justice Robert Jackson, who knew something about the Justice Department, which he headed as attorney general before ascending to the court: Law enforcement is not automatic. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
A town of about 40,000 people, it is the county seat for Luzerne, in the northeast part of the state. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
 I’m considerably less delighted that we arrived there because 5 Justices of the Supreme Court have so decided the matter. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm by Stephen Griffin
  Although the legal analysis here can be intricate, the basis for the 1982 amendments was the kind of “objective” test continually promoted by Justice White for the Supreme Court in voting rights decisions like White v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
She clerked for him in the late 1980s and has written of his approach to the law.SEN. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
The society started in law schools in the 1980s and now has 200 Law School chapters. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This direction was upheld by the Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan on a constitutional basis, when challenged by the Commissioner, in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am by Ilya Somin
Admittedly, the Supreme Court ruled that such sweeping congressional power was permissible in its badly flawed decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), the Supreme Court considered a statute that generally prohibited the picketing of residences, but exempted labor picketing. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
Although careful to stress that some of the current Justices might change her mind, she stated plainly that such cameras “would be a great thing for the Court and…a great thing for the American people. [read post]