Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)" Results 341 - 360 of 723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Sitting in 1972, the immediate future looked like about 1,000 or so new lawyers annually with about three times as many people wanting to get into law school as there were spaces for them. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, as a general matter, the Court found that “no purpose of action against religion can be imputed to any legislation, state or national, because this is a religious people. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
But calls to commit a specific crime are generally not constitutionally protected, see United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
On Tuesday, the court heard argument in McLane v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
 There is a general recognition that police reform should include changes concerning people with disabilities, particularly with respect to equipping law enforcement officials to address challenges facing people with mental disabilities. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Price
The Supreme Court upheld Bush’s action based on his broad statutory powers to exclude aliens from U.S. soil (see Sale v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am by Ilya Somin
Admittedly, the Supreme Court ruled that such sweeping congressional power was permissible in its badly flawed decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
VONS is the Czech acronym for Výbor na obranu nespravedlivě stíhaných (Committee for the Defence of the Unjustly Persecuted): “The committee was founded on April 27, 1978, by a group of Charter 77 signatories [among whom were Václav Havel and Jan Patočka, the latter having died of a stroke ‘after a long and intense interrogation by the secret police’ before the committee was formed] with the aim of following cases of… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
 In February the Higher Regional Court Munich (OLG) decided that YouTube and its service cannot be called to account for any user generated copyright infringements. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
” It pointed to the Supreme Court’s statement in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Joseph Landau
  Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Lots of pages on the general argument that design patents are important in a variety of ways to a variety of industries—brand maintenance; small businesses getting leverage v. large businesses; particular industries. [read post]