Search for: "Goldstein v Held"
Results 341 - 360
of 886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Carpenter 15-1193Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am
And in Luna Torres v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:14 am
That was the main question posed by Zubik v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am
(relisted after the Apr. 22 Conference) Was relisted; likely held (same issue as SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
[MCM Petition and Appendix] MCM’s brief was filed Tom Goldstein along with Ned Heller. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
§ 1344, subsection (1)’s “scheme to defraud a financial institution” requires proof of a specific intent not only to deceive, but also to cheat, a bank, as nine circuits have held, and as petitioner argued here. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:59 pm
Heffernan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
[Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Loughrin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
One other thing bothering the Saudis: a bill pending in Congress would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the attacks of September 11th, 2001. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 5:41 pm
The Court, now functioning with eight Justices, appeared to be deeply divided over the mandate when the Justices held a hearing on it on March 23. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:20 pm
The religious non-profits challenging the mandate in the combined cases of Zubik v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am
Lyle Denniston covered the request in Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 5:14 pm
Billy York Walker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
Caetano v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Louisiana, which held that 2012’s Miller v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:49 pm
The case is Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
