Search for: "Good v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 341 - 360
of 523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm
They propose a “meaningful modification” of the Court’s holding in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
Under this model, if representative bodies did a good job of representing the people, the courts would be unnecessary. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
In any event, it seems to me that the Balintulo approach is correct for two reasons: 1, The general rule is that a precedent remains good law until something happens to it. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
So what do our courts do when the precise words in the Constitution or the statute are not used or are not used in the correct place in the indictment? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:28 am
Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:53 am
., and Mellion v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
R (on the application of First Stop Wholesale Limited) v The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2013] EWCA Civ 183 – granted on 25 July 2013 by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
One of the fascinations of electronic communications is how they make many traditional questions of law new again. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
No requirement to buy unrelated goods. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
When it comes to prosecutors, it is often argued that the aim of the criminal law is to protect particular rights, interests or goods – notably property, the person, and sexual autonomy. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
When it comes to prosecutors, it is often argued that the aim of the criminal law is to protect particular rights, interests or goods – notably property, the person, and sexual autonomy. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
KEEWATIN v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Here's a note on a topic that has not been greatly appreciated in IP circles: the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2013] UKSC 1. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Richard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
High Commissioner for Human Rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:05 pm
To be sure, the minority commissioners can write vociferous dissents and try to signal to the DC Circuit that there are problems, like in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Not a good way to start the new year. [read post]
