Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 68,475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2024, 11:50 am
The next day, another Trump-appointed federal district judge in Oklahoma granted a preliminary injunction in a challenge brought by that state. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 11:19 am
State Legislative Developments Algorithmic Discrimination & Consumer Protection: The Colorado AI Act (SB 205) was signed into law on May 17, making Colorado the first state to enact AI legislation addressing risks of algorithmic discrimination in the development and deployment of AI. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:49 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:31 am
§ 283, which states: [A Court] may grant injunctions in accordance with the principles of equity to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent, on such terms as the court deems reasonable. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:14 am
It seems fair enough to state that there is a bias in favour of the patentee before the Opposition Division. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 11:19 am
Supreme Court found online age verification to be likely unconstitutional under the First Amendment in the 2004 case Ashcroft v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 10:50 am
In reaching this decision, the Court relied on Jarkesy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:14 am
Susan V. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 7:40 am
United States resembles Roe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
In Passarella v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:51 pm
Alito, who had authored the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:58 am
United States goes way too far in granting such immunity to the president. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:29 am
In Ganpat v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:17 am
In the second case, Panasonic v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 8:24 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
