Search for: "Graves v. Powers"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 2:48 pm
Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Farah v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, the Second Circuit concluded that “it would gravely distort the doctrine of qualified immunity to hold that a school official should fairly be said to ‘know’ that the law forb[ids] conduct not previously identified as unlawful. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:37 pm
(People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427 [1986]; Gordon v People, 33 NY 501 [1865]; Graves v United States, 150 US 118, 121 [1893]).Importantly, this rule applies even where a party is not required to produce any evidence or that type of evidence. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
(Hill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
Many organizations across the political spectrum have grave concerns about what New York is doing. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am
In assuming the role of judge, juror and executioner, Lord Hain has made a grave mistake. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Diamond v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:12 am
In ALI SALEH KAHLAH AL-MARRI v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:34 pm
From Hullibarger v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:39 am
Nonetheless, in Burwell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:09 am
Such a power is essential for eliciting the truth as an obligation of oath could be. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:03 pm
”[1] However the arguments put forth by the critics, in their defense of the outmoded positivist notion of the absolute power of national sovereignty, threaten to undermine the precedential foundation of the very doctrine which makes such a “safe harbor” impossible. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
The court noted that CPLR 7511(b) sets forth the limited grounds on which a petitioner can seek to vacate an award, namely misconduct by the arbitrator, partiality, exceeding the arbitrator’s powers, or procedural error. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
Nevertheless, close to my own heart, I would propose Lord Bingham’s powerful dissenting speech in Roberts v Parole Board, in which the House of Lords found itself fundamentally divided on whether a closed evidence procedure was permissible in Parole Board proceedings. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
Florida 14-906Issue: Whether the Florida Supreme Court's prejudice analysis – notwithstanding grave deficiencies in counsel's development and presentation of mitigating evidence – can be squared with Strickland v. [read post]
