Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Claims can be brought under federal common law for public nuisance only when the courts are 'compelled to consider federal questions which cannot be answered from federal statutes alone.' [citing: City of Milwaukee v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:47 am
Dev., et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:31 pm
We will explain the new Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit aimed at changing elements of an Environmental Protection Agency rule that will require oil and natural gas companies to report their greenhouse gas emissions (American Gas Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 5:01 am
Briefly: In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses what she describes as a new phenomenon of conservative judges taking a broader approach to standing, as well as what role that phenomenon might play in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:40 pm
One of the only practical benefits for federalism to emerge out of NFIB v Sebelius was the 3-vote opinion’s strengthening of the limit against Congress’ placing “coercive” conditions on federal grants in Part IV(B). [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 1:42 am
Linda Greenhouse's meditation on John Roberts's dissent in the global warming case (Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in the six cases collectively known as the greenhouse gas cases, which challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate the emission of greenhouse gases from stationary sources. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:06 am
(Orin Kerr) Linda Greenhouse has a post up about the recent decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:52 am
Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
Not surprisingly, the Court found in a 8-0 opinion that EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, affirmed by the Court in Massachusetts v EPA, “displaces” any federal common law nuisance claim for interstate air pollution resulting in climate change. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:01 am
For instance, given Mass v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:04 pm
To be fair, the US Supreme Court opened the door for the EPA to make this move in its decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:08 pm
Over two years ago, on April 2, 2007, the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:36 am
EPA and Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm
Wrote the European Court of Human Rights in Case of A, B, and C v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:08 pm
[JURIST] President Bush urged Congress on Tuesday to adopt his proposed targets for alternative fuel use [White House energy policy materials] as a way of combating greenhouse gas emissions [JURIST news archive; EPA backgrounder] a day after the US Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:19 am
Greenhouse, Michael Kelleher & Randy Herndon (all of McDermott Will & Emery, Washington, D.C.), District Court Opinion Guts Work Product Protection for Tax Opinions, 144 Tax Notes 329 (July 21, 2014): With implications that should alarm tax controversy practitioners and their clients, in Schaeffler v. [read post]
