Search for: "Grey v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2018, 8:53 am
That was cited as authority in that case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
” Earlier this month, in Haruvi v Hungerford (81 Misc 3d 1229[A] [Sup Ct, NY County Jan. 16, 2024]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok decided another “grey area” BCL § 909 case. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
1 May 2011, 11:12 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:20 am
Despite living in a sexually liberal era that celebrates “50 shades of grey,” Canada, and its legal system in particular, is accepting of significantly fewer shades. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Following this, Professor Marshall Leaffer (Indiana Uni Maurer School of Law) was up next, tackling the grey (or gray) market; this, he observed, seems to be an insoluble problem. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:35 pm
Women's Rights Law Reporter; V. 24, NO. 2, SPRING, 2003; pp. 83-99, 17p, including a Find It! [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:19 pm
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:31 pm
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
Coleman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:25 am
Midnight Marine Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm
Some growers serve both the grey and legal market marijuana seeds. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
Last year was green; this year is a silvery-grey (right). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 1:00 am
In 3 cases, the applicants were not properly represented by a lawyer before the GC: T‑128/21 (Finnish legal counsel), T-716/20 (lawyer was CEO of the applicant), and T‑424/21 (Daimler v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:28 am
Wally, ever the optimist, hopes that circuit court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am
U.S. v Averette (1970) significantly changed its applicability, as the Court of Military Appeals decided that the UCMJ only applied to civilians in times of formally declared war. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 6:53 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
