Search for: "Griffith v. Griffith" Results 341 - 360 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Illinois lawyer Shawn Collins of The Collins Law Firm on the firm’s blog, Pollution Law Watch “Consent” in the Wake of State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Morgan Griffith (R-VA), and Rep. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Ben
 Judgment of the President of Court of First Instance of Antwerp (Belgium), 15 January 2015, docket number 14/4305/A, Katrijn Van Giel v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
More on the Sen Times here.On Wednesday 6th of May 2015, Professor Jonathan Griffiths (Queen Mary University) will deliver a talk entitled "Parody and copyright in EU copyright law" at the City University. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
The speaker is Jonathan Griffiths (Queen Mary University) and the title of his talk is "Parody and copyright in EU copyright law". [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Victor DiGioia and Sarah Klein of Becker & Poliakoff on the firm’s blog, Biz Law Today Two for Tuesdays: Content Marketing Metrics – Legal marketing expert Lindsay Griffiths of International Lawyers Network on Zen & The Art of Legal Networking Obama Administration Recognizes Cyber Threats to U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Contrary to ACS's contention, the deprivation of the right to counsel is a [29 A.D.3d 1016] fundamental error warranting reversal (see Matter of Otto v Otto, 26 AD3d 498 [2006]; Matter of Miranda v Vasquez, 14 AD3d 566 [2005]; Matter of Knight v Griffith, 13 AD3d 449 [2004]; Matter of Vladimir M., 206 AD2d 482, 483 [1994]; Matter of Williams v Williams, 91 AD2d 1044, 1045 [1983]). [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
SONGS* ABOUT BOOKS & AUTHORS *and some Monty Python and Beat Poetry Click Here for link to Spotify Playlist Radiohead – 2 + 2 = 5 Deborah Pardes – 7th StepMonty Python – A Book At Bedtime Jason Anderson – A Book Laid On It's BindingAngus & Julia Stone – A Book Like ThisBenny's Head – A Bookish GirlAdam's Plastic Pond – A Brief History of English LiteratureThe Gentle Waves – A Chapter in the Life of… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
SONGS* ABOUT BOOKS &AUTHORS *and some Monty Python and Beat Poetry Click Here for link to Spotify Playlist Radiohead – 2 + 2 = 5 Deborah Pardes – 7th StepMonty Python – A Book At Bedtime Jason Anderson – A Book Laid On It's BindingAngus & Julia Stone – A Book Like ThisBenny's Head – A Bookish GirlAdam's Plastic Pond – A Brief History of English LiteratureThe Gentle Waves – A Chapter in the Life of MathewTom… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
SONGS* ABOUT BOOKS &AUTHORS *and some Monty Python and Beat Poetry Click Here for link to Spotify Playlist Radiohead – 2 + 2 = 5 Deborah Pardes – 7th StepMonty Python – A Book At Bedtime Jason Anderson – A Book Laid On It's BindingAngus & Julia Stone – A Book Like ThisBenny's Head – A Bookish GirlAdam's Plastic Pond – A Brief History of English LiteratureThe Gentle Waves – A Chapter in the Life of MathewTom… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
Songs (mostly) about books & authors by a man who nearly amused himself to death. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-0639 (second relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]