Search for: "Groves v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 380
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2008, 6:12 pm
Usually, in church-state cases, there's a pattern. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Solicitor General Daryl Joseffer for the United States as amicus. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:47 pm
United City of Yorkville v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 10:21 am
United States, Docket No. 07-513.I did a similar post for Constitution Day last year. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 3:31 pm
A party sometimes asks a lower court to stay its mandate while it prepares a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
On Monday, the city of Pleasant Grove, Utah, filed this opening brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
Tom F. nondecision by the United States Supreme Court last October. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:51 am
The United States Supreme Court begins its two week spring break today. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 2:51 am
(Remember that Article I section 8 of the Constitution specifically gives Congress the power to regulate naturalization, not immigration).The Supreme Court avoided the question of Congress's power to regulate slavery under the Commerce Clause in 1841 in Groves v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
