Search for: "H. v. H." Results 341 - 360 of 15,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2012, 6:32 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California allowing other aspects of the Martin v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:55 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
On March 10, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court decided Klooster v Charlevoix, holding as follows: (1) A “conveyance” for purposes of the GPTA does not require a written instrument, and (2) when a joint tenancy is terminated by the death of a cotenant, this event is within the joint-tenancy exception created by MCL 211.27a(7)(h) and was thus not a transfer of ownership that uncapped the property. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:11 am by Employment and Labor Group
Date et heure: Vendredi 20 mars 2020Midi – 13 h (HAE)10 h – 11 h (HAR) 9 h – 10 h (HAP) Notre groupe de droit du travail vous invite à un webinaire d’une heure sur les enjeux que la pandémie de COVID-19 soulève dans les milieux de travail. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:14 am by John Steele
  (h/t: Patently-O)  Syllaubs: This purpose of this essay is to provide an early analysis of some of the most substantial law and policy concerns raised by the very recent en banc decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the now famous Therasense v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:42 am by Daily Record Staff
Zoning — Not specially aggrieved — Substantial evidence This appeal involves a dispute regarding the approval of appellee’s, H & R Rock, LLC’s (“H & R Rock’s”) redline revision to a previously approved Site Development Plan (“SDP”). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Here, via H-Law, are the articles in the Journal of Supreme Court History, 39:1: A Better Story in Prigg v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:45 am
In einer Medienmitteilung zum Verhältnis von Völkerrecht und Landesrecht hält der Bundesrat fest, dass sich die geltende Regelung grundsätzlich bewährt hat. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:14 am
Adding to a circuit split that the Supreme Court may have to resolve, a split panel of the Sixth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:40 pm by Derek Muller
Rick H. links to the recent Pennsylvania court decision and notes that there could be a Legislature Thereof Clause-style challenge to it, a la Chief Justice Rehnquist’s opinion in Bush v. [read post]