Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 341 - 360 of 36,562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 4:51 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Atta v HDI Global Specialty SE [2023] EWHC 2028 (KB)] Atta v HDI Global Specialty SE [2023] EWHC 2028 (KB) (04 April 2023) (bailii.org) [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:47 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The Attorney General can file a lawsuit to halt deceptive practices without needing to demonstrate anyone has been directly harmed, a requirement necessary for a private plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
It intended to maintain the general purpose of the offence, that it should refer to threats of violence, non-physical threats of harm, and duress, including from people in positions of power such as faith leaders. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am by Chris Castle
The difference is that those are US companies (essentially) and not a foreign government actively trying to undermine the U.S. and harm US citizens. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Dismissed Employee Asserts that She Was Terminated Because of Her Age The case of Hall v Zurn Industries Limited involved an employee (“CH”) who began working for Monteco Ltd. on January 18, 2008 as the part-time Director of Human Resources. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Dismissed Employee Asserts that She Was Terminated Because of Her Age The case of Hall v Zurn Industries Limited involved an employee (“CH”) who began working for Monteco Ltd. on January 18, 2008 as the part-time Director of Human Resources. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” Each of these theories of competitive harm is discussed in the 2023 Merger Guidelines. [read post]