Search for: "HARPER v. STATE" Results 341 - 360 of 1,031
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2021, 7:10 am by Arturo Jara
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Robert Harper
  UAGPPJA does so by “providing a more streamlined and predictable process, saving state funds and conserving judicial resources, and reducing the possibility for abuse and expense of the alleged incapacitated person and that person’s family and caretakers” (see id.; Schwaber & Kafer, P.C. v Alpizar, Index No. 157599/2020, 2021 WL 408231, at *2 [Sup Ct, New York County Feb. 5, 2021]). [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Abramovich v Harper Collins, issued on 22 March 2021 Last Week in the Courts On 21 and 22 March 2021 Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
The clause states: "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
The second argument of the day will be BP PLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
How do you think Hamilton would have viewed the state of modern Supreme Court nominations? [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
That includes home bakers like IJ client Cindy Harper, who was excited about the prospect of selling her delicious sugar cookies to friends in Lincoln. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]