Search for: "HAWKINS v. HAWKINS"
Results 341 - 360
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 5:21 am
Hawkins, 2007 Ohio 2080, 2007 Ohio App. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
Mandel (1972), or Kerry v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
This aspect of Palmer, particularly if read in combination with the BIACC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
United States, 336 U.S. 440 (1949) (holding that, in a close case, erroneously admitted evidence -- even if cumulative of other evidence -- can 'tip the scales' against the defendant) and Hawkins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Hawkins and Richard A. [read post]
18 May 2008, 4:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:17 am
The New Jersey Appellate Division, in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:45 am
In Faretta v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Parental Authority, Incomplete Transfers, and Japanese Courts in Colonial Taiwan, 1919-1936” -Nurfadzilah Yahaya “Question of Guardianship in Colonial Southeast Asia: Arab Children under British and Dutch Rule” Commentator: MJ Maynes & Barbara Young Welke Panel 5: Class, Sexuality, Race and Social Order -Cynthia Greenlee “Due to Her Tender Age: African-Americans, Child Rape and South Carolina Courts, 1885-1905” -Sara Mayeux “Car Trouble: Adolescence,… [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Hawkins. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:55 am
In an opinion issued last week, Dawkins v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:54 pm
In 2012, a divided court upheld the mandate in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
Amant v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
It was soon clear that Hawkins, and the other judges, were keenly interested in the Supreme Court’s 1996 ruling in Romer v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:08 am
” Hawkins v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
A D.C. district court decision, Olsen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
But since "CPL 470.15(2)(a) authorizes an appellate court to modify a judgment by reducing a conviction to a lesser included offense if it determines the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction for the greater offense but sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of the lesser " (People v Hawkins, 99 NY2d 592 [2003]) and the prerequisite for doing that is preservation of the issue by an appropriate motion for a trial order of dismissal why is a claim of… [read post]
