Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
The Supreme Court appeal was heard by a panel of five Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
In delivering her substantive judgment, Lady Hale suggested that that the appropriate solution to avoid infringements in individual cases would be to recast the guidance which accompanied the Rule to grant exemptions in cases where compliance with the requirement is simply impracticable, and one remedy might be for the court to declare that the present application of the Guidance is incompatible with the rights of individuals in such circumstances. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:20 am
In Everglades Interactive, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:13 am
Handing down a unanimous decision, Lady Hale in Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) ruled that the default position is that the public should be allowed access not only to parties’ submissions and arguments, but also to documents which have been placed before the court and referred to during the hearing. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:51 am
As the district judge in Peoples was completing her order granting remand, her neighbor down the hall was busy denying remand on similar facts in Hale v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
Applying the recent ECHR cases of Genovese v Malta (2012) App no. 53124/09 and Kuric v Slovenia (2012) App no. 26828/06, Lady Hale held that ECHR, art 8 is engaged because the denial of citizenship significantly affects a person’s social identity. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am
This was one of the issues that was (as Lord Hope explained) decided in Watson v M’Ewan? [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:32 pm
I wonder if Lady Hale thought about that before she decided she knew better than everyone else. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:13 pm
The holding of the Fifth Circuit was that the Bankruptcy statute of limitations, contained in Section 108(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (two years) preempted the one year Louisiana statute of limitations for legal malpractice.The underlying action was a multi-million dollar judgment against Gary Eugene Hale, which forced him into bankruptcy. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am
On the question of jurisdiction, it was held that Sala v SSHD [2016] UKUT 411 had rightly been overruled by the Court of Appeal in a subsequent decision on the interpretation of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), reg 26. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
As Lady Hale notes at paragraph 12: “12. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am
Lady Hale, applying a common sense approach to the issue, held that: ‘The question is whether the reasons for the failure to offer a new contract relate to the individual or to the needs of the business. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The appeals were heard by a seven justice panel of Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:51 am
In Too Much Media v Hale, the defendant in a defamation case argued that she could protect her sources under NJ's press shield law. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lady Hale adjourns the Court for lunch until 14:00. 1303: Lord Pannick QC says authorities on dissolution are not good precedents as this power no longer exists and was personal to the Monarch. 1300: Lord Pannick QC accepts that the authorities sug [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
:Blackledge v. [read post]
