Search for: "Hall v. POWER" Results 341 - 360 of 1,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2019, 4:26 am by SHG
The public knows nothing about it and there’s no way to challenge it in court, let alone debate it in the halls of Congress. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
In both cases, the criminal law was the means through which the state could exercise its power to mediate encounters of a sexual nature and adjudge some permitted and some not. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
MSN – Reid Epstein, Maggie Astor, and Danny Hakim (New York Times) | Published: 8/4/2019 The political momentum in the gun control debate has shifted in the year leading up to the mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton, with gun control advocates taking a more empowered stance and the National Rifle Association (NRA) consumed by internal power struggles. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Some of the findings included that undergraduate GPA was a more powerful predictor than LSAT score, with a high LSAT and low GPA being a worse predictor than the opposite. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am by Steve Vladeck
Exactly 100 years after William Butler Yeats warned that “the centre cannot hold,” Thomas’s volume is not just an accessible “intimate portrait” of someone who, in his words, “is easy to caricature and harder to understand;” it is a powerful reminder of the increasingly forgotten virtues of moderation, compromise, and civility—not just within the marble halls of One First Street, but on Main Street, as well. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 conference)   Hall v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
The Canadian Bar Association “IP Day” – May 30, 2019At the Canadian Bar Association’s perennial “IP day” on May 30, 2019, there was a first ever “town hall” session on the Copyright Board (the “Board”). [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Hall, and held that a state cannot be sued in the courts of another state without its consent; he argues that “there was no basis to overrule Hall, because that case was both correct and readily distinguishable from this one, and there were other bases for setting aside what the Nevada courts did here. [read post]