Search for: "Hand v. Board of Education"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 9:36 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm
Instead, the prosecutor inadvertently showed an image of the defendant with several phones in his hand while wearing gold necklaces and standing in front of a mirror, an image similar to a photo the trial judge had ruled inadmissible under North Carolina Rule of Evidence 403. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am
As anyone familiar with the actual law in Davis v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Board of Education, it is also presumptively a problematic basis to use in affirmative action programs which seek to benefit African Americans, albeit to the material detriment of other groups such as white persons. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
She argued, and won, Buck v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:30 pm
Earlier this week, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision on the case York University v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
The local Board of Education, as a party in interest on the forfeiture, objected on the grounds that filing the motion was the unauthorized practice of law. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Norton describes Rust v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 4:38 am
So with the wave of a hand, the challenge of the conclusory statement disappears, the court sleeps well that night, crediting “reliable hearsay,” never again worrying about this defendant who committed the very awful crime. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
., inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the sign at hand, states that:1. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am
Monroe County Board of Ed., that the harassment must be “severe, pervasive and objectively offensive. [read post]
