Search for: "Harmon Law Offices"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
Under North Carolina law at the time, he was subject to search by a post-release supervision officer at reasonable times when the search is reasonably related to the purposes of supervision. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:22 am
There are two other provisions relating to the rule of law. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm
On Oct. 8, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified two opinions released by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) relating to the FBI’s use of information collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:35 am
Interested parties may also submit written comments to the Office of the AG through December 8, 2019. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Cost to Retail Investors and Public Markets of “Harmonizing” Securities Offering Exemptions By Erik F. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 12:54 pm
In 1997, the World Intellectual Property Office conducted a consultation to register the interests of national governments in harmonizing questions of intellectual property rights in space (here, para 35). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am
MPEG MEETING; 26.7.2010 - 30.7.2010; GENEVA; (MOTION PICTURE EXPERT GROUP OR ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11);or, of documentD2: HAISHAN ZHONG ET AL: "Finalization of CE on QMF based harmonic transposer", MPEG Ref. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
The Institute called on the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office to provide more detailed information about warrants seeking journalists’ digital data and information that could identify their sources. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Carey, 376 F.3d 841, 847–48 (9th Cir.2004) (relying on expert testimony comparing the objective elements—pitch, melodies, baselines, tempo, chords, structure, and harmonic rhythm—of musical works); Chiate v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:00 pm
In this regard, he suggests that the questions of who is “a person skilled in the art” and what is “the prior art” should be regarded as matters of national law as these concepts are not harmonized by the EU, so that they would have to be assessed by the national courts. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:11 am
Having offices at the central division in London, Paris and Munich is nothing but marketing. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:35 am
In setting the question, AIPPI noted that the lack of a harmonized worldwide approach to plausibility at present causes legal uncertainty, increased complexity and reduced collaboration between patent offices. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:20 am
The Codification Division of the UN Office of Legal Affairs recently added two lectures to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
However, this act if legislated successfully would establish a small claims tribunal within the US Copyright Office, simplifying defense of copyrights. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:47 am
On June 20, 2019 the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) announced an exclusion process for tariffs imposed on September 2018 (“List 3”) pursuant to the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:12 am
“ANE transactions” are transactions connected with a non-U.S. person’s dealing activity that are “arranged, negotiated, or executed” by personnel located in a U.S. branch or office of the non-U.S. person or its agent. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
The Commission also acknowledges some developments detrimental to achieving a uniform approach across the EU (e.g., Germany’s stricter requirements for data protection officers) and encourages Member States to take steps to ensure greater harmonization. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:00 pm
Democracies perpetually strive for, yet inevitably fall short of, harmonizing what is legal (and illegal) and what is just (and unjust). [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:06 pm
To find the answer, look to the law. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
The applicable statute is Section 123 of the Patent Act, which reads in the GPTO’s translation as follows: (1) Any person who, through no fault of his own (ohne Verschulden), has been prevented from observing a time limit vis-à-vis the Patent Office or the Patent Court, the failure of observing it being detrimental to his rights according to the provisions of the law, shall, on request, have his rights reinstated. [read post]
