Search for: "Harriet White"
Results 341 - 360
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2007, 9:00 am
" “The Keys to the Kingdom”: Despite her former title as the DOJ’s liaison to the White House, she said she didn’t play a significant role in the dismissals and never discussed them with Karl Rove or Harriet Miers. [read post]
6 May 2007, 8:02 am
” The editorial asks Congress to compel Harriet Miers, Karl Rove and other White House officials “to finally tell the truth to the American people. [read post]
3 May 2007, 9:17 am
Second, the Times cites evidence that then-White House counsel Harriet Miers asked DOJ staffers whether Yang could be forced out. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
Former White House Counsel Miers Rejoining Locke Liddell
Texas Lawyer
Former White House counsel and one-time Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers will return to Locke Liddell & Sapp as a partner in the public policy and litigation groups. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:08 pm
There was much speculation about where former White House counsel Harriet Miers, of the ill-fated Supreme Court nomination, would wind up. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
"Harriet Miers to Return to Locke Liddell & Sapp": Texas Lawyer today contains an article that begins, "Former White House Counsel Harriet Miers will return to Locke Liddell & Sapp, the firm she formerly co-managed, on May 1 as a partner. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:32 am
Former White House counsel and failed Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers will return to Locke Liddell & Sapp, the firm she formerly co-managed, on May 1 as a partner. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:10 pm
Ask Gonzo if it is true that, for example, "Harriet Miers said . . . [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 9:49 pm
It is increasingly plain that he didn't act for much of a reason at all, other than that he was presented with a list of names that had already been cleared with Karl Rove and Harriet Miers. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 12:30 am
The email, sent on January 9, 2006 to former White House counsel Harriet Miers, conflicts testimony last month in which the aide said that no successors were considered before the firings. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:49 pm
The email, sent on January 9, 2006 to former White House counsel Harriet Miers, conflicts testimony last month in which the aide said that no successors were considered before the firings. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:50 pm
[JURIST] US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile] and White House counsel Harriet Miers [official profile] were deeply involved in discussions about the firings of federal prosecutors [JURIST news archive], according to testimony [statement text] Thursday from former Gonzales chief of staff Kyle Sampson [official profile] before the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website]. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 7:32 am
Said Sampson: “I remember on one occasion, in 2006 . . . that I was speaking with Harriet Miers and Bill Kelley, and I raised Patrick Fitzgerald . . . [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 2:24 am
(As I've noted previously, the most important limitation in the White House Counsel's offer is not that Rove, et al., would be testifying without oath, but that they would not answer any questions, nor provide any documents, concerning internal White House activities and communications.)And so the White House endeavors to place the blame squarely on the sholders of the Attorney General. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 7:22 pm
It was Harriet Miers's idea. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 10:56 am
Sampson wrote: ''Getting him appointed was important to Harriet, Karl, etc.,'' a reference to Ms. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:54 am
Harriet Miers wasn’t involved? [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 4:45 am
Attorney Controversy: Why Bush Refuses to Allow Karl Rove and Harriet Miers to Testify Before Congress, and What Role New White House Counsel Fred Fielding May Play. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:47 pm
[JURIST] The US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] on Wednesday authorized subpoenas for former White House Counsel Harriet Miers [official profile], Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove [official profile], and several DOJ aides to testify and provide documents to the committee regarding the recent US Attorney firing scandal [JURIST news archive]. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:38 am
" I suspect the reason Tony Snow was trying to suggest that this decision was made entirely within DOJ is that the Administration is trying desperately (and understandably) to withhold communications that occurred within the White House itself (e.g., among Karl Rove, Harriet Miers, and/or the President). [read post]
