Search for: "Harris v. Clerk of Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Briefly: As Lyle Denniston reports at this blog, yesterday the Court announced that Scott Harris, the Court’s legal counsel, will succeed William Suter as the Clerk of Court on September 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
The one-sentence order immediately nullified a stay order issued last June by the Circuit Court in the “Proposition 8″ case — Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
As millions of people eagerly await next week’s Supreme Court action in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:00 am
Relatedly: BMO Harris Bank has agreed to a $400,000 settlement with fourteen of its former employees in connection with allegations brought by the EEOC pursuant to the ADA that BMO Harris had illegally terminated the employees after they had taken medical leave instead of provided reasonable accommodations that would have enabled them to return to work. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court earlier this week, City of Arlington, Texas v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Harris, 133 S.Ct. 1050 (2013) (quoting Texas v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am
” Hartwell Harris was represented by Tamara Freeze, Robert Odell, Allison Lin and law clerk Harrison Brown. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Juries, social media and the internet In the Courts On 4 February 2013 judgment was given in the case of Adams v Cruddas ([2013] EWHC 145 (QB)) (discussed above) On 5 February 2013 the Court of Appeal (Ward and Moses LJJ) refused the claimant permission to appeal in the case of McGrath & Anr v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
This is a plausible understanding of “substantial obstacle,” particularly given the Supreme Court precedents that have followed Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:03 am
Medellin v. [read post]
