Search for: "Harris v. Fitting"
Results 341 - 360
of 425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
P&G v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Harris. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Harris, 188 N.J. 415 (2006), the Legislature enacted Public Law 2006, Chapter 103,establishing civil unions for same-sex couples effective February 19, 2007. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
There are pockets that demand different approaches.Jake Linford: Error costs v. administrative costs. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
As Harry Potter author J.K. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
But to do that, one really has to sit and reflect on how the small pieces fit together, and at which intersections there is the most room for beneficial manipulation. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 12:46 pm
The caption reads Missouri v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
A Musical Experience + Helmut Lang + Henna by Senya + House of Leifer + J&J Snack Foods Corporation + J and V Audio Inc. + JAKKS Pacific, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
It goes to the fundamental ways in which different yet related doctrines (in this case Spending Clause doctrine and the anti-commandeering principle) involving federal-state relations fit together. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am
My writings about the third of the above themes did not take form until ‘Organized Labor, the Supreme Court, and Harris v Quinn: Déjà Vu All Over Again? [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
The two don't fit together very well.The FDA's legal justification for the ban is absolutist - having nothing whatever to do either with the truth of the information, or with the safety of the off-label use involved. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
"What has always been an imperfect fit between marriage and procreation is now called into question. [read post]
