Search for: "Hewlett v. Hewlett-Packard"
Results 341 - 360
of 507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2015, 12:43 am
In that Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 5:54 am
Marco Rubio (R-FL), former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard Carly Fiorina, Sen. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm
’s (“APM”) motion to restrict the theories and evidence of importation that Complainants Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:07 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co., No. 13-CV-0119-LHK, 2013 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Wells Fargo & Company et al (Docket Report) ITC finds no violation of s 337 by importation and sale of semiconductor integrated circuits by respondents LSI and Seagate (ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps General Electric – ITC denies motion for summary determination of no inequitable conduct in certain variable speed wind turbines (ITC Law Blog) Greenshift - Greenshift seeks quick injunction against Cardinal Ethanol (Green Patent Blog)… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Wells Fargo & Company et al (Docket Report) ITC finds no violation of s 337 by importation and sale of semiconductor integrated circuits by respondents LSI and Seagate (ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps General Electric – ITC denies motion for summary determination of no inequitable conduct in certain variable speed wind turbines (ITC Law Blog) Greenshift - Greenshift seeks quick injunction against Cardinal Ethanol (Green Patent Blog)… [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:25 am
With exceptions such as the merger between Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, the shareholder vote has not been a critical part of the mergers & acquisitions process. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Hewlett-Packard Co., Case No. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
A similar decision was found in In re Muller, 417 F.2d 1387 (CCPA 1969), as well as in Hewlett–Packard Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
In 2010, U.S. companies obtained 50.3% of granted patents, compared with 49% in 2009.High-tech patents also dominated areas with the heaviest new patenting activity:Multiplex Communications (US class 370) -- 3.3% of totalSolid-State Devices and Transistors (US class 257) -- 3.1%Semiconductors (US class 438) -- 2.7%Drug Compositions (US class 514) -- 2.1% Data Processing and File Management (US class 707) -- 2%Computers and Processing Systems (US class 709) -- 2%… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
(v) how does innovation fare, and in what settings, if any, does it fare, during an economic downturn? [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:35 am
It now appears that their strategy has succeeded, as Hewlett-Packard previously negotiated to include proxy access and the proposal won at Nabors. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:59 am
Similarly, Altman v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
High Court Rejects Hewlett-Packard's Efforts to Block Class Action Suit
The Associated Press
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed a class action lawsuit to proceed against Hewlett-Packard Co. that alleges Compaq Computer Corp., now a part of HP, sold defective computers. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65; Mylan… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
This Katfriend notes that a somewhat more nuanced view of the issue of burden of proof for consumption of trade mark rights was recently set out by the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-367/21, Hewlett Packard Development Company LP v Senetic S.A., EU:C:2024:61 (see IPKat post here) but the facts of that case was different from this case in many aspects.The court also obiter confirmed that Tissot had the right under Article 15(2) of the EU Trade Mark Directive to… [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:02 pm
The case arose from a “fire sale” by defendant Barnes & Noble of certain discontinued Hewlett Packard TouchPads. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/plq3gzTcnD -> Costs order in Warman v. [read post]
