Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann" Results 341 - 360 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am by INFORRM
This post is an abridged version of a paper which will appear in the journal Communications Law later this year and which can be read here in draft. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm by Rosalind English
Along with the contributions of Lord Judge, Lord Hoffmann and Lady Justice Arden, this address forms part of an elegant but increasingly intense debate that reflects unease about Strasbourg. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
As Lord Hoffmann made clear in the Lord Grey School case (para 61), the breach of such a public law duty, not giving rise to a private right of action, cannot be promoted to a breach of duty under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 remediable by a claim for damages. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
They ask as follows: "(i) Are Article 7(2) of [the repealed and re-enacted but regularly cited] Council Directive 89/104 ... to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and the associated case-law, in particular the judgments of the Court of Justice in Cases 102/77 Hoffmann-La Roche v Centrafarm and 1/81 Pfizer v Eurim-Pharm and Joined Cases C-427/93, C-429/93 and C-436/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova, to be interpreted… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm by Bexis
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 892 A.2d 694, 705 (N.J. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am by NL
On the facts of this case, both an Oxley v Hiscock and a Stack v Dowden approach should reach the same end point. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am by NL
On the facts of this case, both an Oxley v Hiscock and a Stack v Dowden approach should reach the same end point. [read post]
15 May 2010, 8:25 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann (Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam) has published Moralpolitik: Geschichte der Menschenrechte im 20. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am by INFORRM
In this feature we revisit some older posts which may still be of current interest. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm by INFORRM
The Court adopted the description of the Article 8 / 10 balancing exercise given by Lord Hoffmann in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457, at [55] and [56] (a case brought by Naomi Campbell against a newspaper which had published photographs of her leaving a drug treatment session): ‘when press freedom comes into conflict with another interest protected by the law, the question is whether there is a sufficient public interest in that particular publication to… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am by Marta Requejo
” Related posts:Forum non conveniens, anti-suit injunctions, and concurrent US and Australian copyright proceedings In TS Production LLC v Drew Pictures Pty Ltd [2008]... [read post]