Search for: "House v. United States, IRS" Results 341 - 360 of 407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation maintains operations and well sites throughout the United States and contracts with third party staffing companies to acquire laborers and consultants. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am by Mandelman
Levitin also said that the problem could “cloud title to nearly every property in the United States” and could lead to trillions of dollars in losses. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm by John Ross
She sues his employer (the United States) for negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
  The Justice Department yesterday announced a task force aimed at identifying ways to protect reproductive rights in the wake of the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
But I swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States and I witnessed the NSA violati [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm by Steve
"Well, now that's a little more direct, an administration official stating that the Fairness Doctrine was used to harass political opponents. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm by Carter Ruml
 Apparently, the IRS will not be turning its full enforcement powers on health insurance scofflaws. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]