Search for: "Houston v. Houston et al" Results 341 - 360 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
Indeed, Justice Antonin Scalia earlier this year urged the Supreme Court to take up the issue in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Sorich, et al v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were so… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence:  Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
., d/b/a Allied Mechanical (31-CA-26605, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 117) Ontario, CA May 31, 2007. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
State and Federal Hospice Audit and Investigation Efforts are Expanding in 2022 (May 12, 2022): Hospice agencies are again the focus of both state and federal investigators and prosecutors around the country. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Official account frames her as “Paris Hilton” of her day, downplaying other issues around addiction and femininity; so too w/Whitney Houston. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
That is not the issue of proportionality as such - proportionality as such is the situation where a commander, without any special or extra intent of wanton and depraved destruction, was nonetheless found liable under the laws of war for destruction because the court simply found it disproportionate as such.)The full declaration from which this is drawn can be found on SSRN, here, and the reply declaration to the plaintiffs experts (Michael Reisman and I were experts for the defendant corporations,… [read post]