Search for: "Hudson v. US Government"
Results 341 - 360
of 604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Hudson was the presiding judge for the lawsuit brought against the US Government by Virginia over a mandate requiring people to buy health insurance by 2014. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[22] While Virginia Pharmacy found that commercial speech is entitled to at least some level of First Amendment protection, the level of judicial review was not articulated until a few years later in the seminal case Central Hudson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:32 pm
‘Sovereignty shorn of the last vestige of power’ [Lighthouses in Crete and Samos (France v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
She testified that batterers often believe they are “privileged and entitled to coerce and control the victims using intimidating gestures, using threats, [and] depriving them of rights and freedoms” to get what they want. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Under the Central Hudson test, commercial speech is protected if it concerns lawful activity and is not misleading. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:35 am
Aside from the powerful precedent set in Hudson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
[quoting West Virginia v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:17 am
Google, Hudson County (N.J.) [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It also is the ultimate ground of the Court’s holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
United States 13-1367Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a statute that denies a government benefit based on a recipient’s failure to express support for a proposed course of government action, is subject to, and survives, strict scrutiny under the First Amendment; and (2) whether, to successfully defend a viewpoint-discriminatory statute… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:49 am
V. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court decided last Term in Hudson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:07 am
It also goes far beyond municipal bylaws to curb the cosmetic use of pesticides, which were upheld by the Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
[xviii] Hudson, John. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:12 am
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 12:54 pm
In Kraft v. [read post]
