Search for: "Hughes, Appeal of"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2021, 2:14 pm
Katfriend Henry Yang summarised the reasoning of the Court of Appeal thereto in the recent case of Autostore v Ocado.GuestKat Rose Hughes considered the tricky balance to be struck in determining when pre-clinical data plausibly supports a therapeutic effect, as was raised in a recent Board of Appeal decision (T 966/18). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:20 am
An appeal seems highly likely, so stay tuned! [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the defendant’s appeal. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:30 am
Matheson currently holds the Hugh B. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
By Rose Hughes [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:24 pm
ShareMonday’s decision in Hughes v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
Hughes, No. 95,256 (Kan. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The BBC appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:39 pm
Hughes Justice Complex, 25 Market Street, Trenton, New Jersey. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
In late 2018, the Court of Appeal held that it did have jurisdiction to hear an appeal and it granted Mr Merricks permission to appeal. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 8:27 am
Hugh Corder, Professor of Public Law, University of Cape Town This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:00 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Google appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:31 am
It amazed me to learn that the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals said no. [read post]
2 May 2007, 10:36 am
Hughes 11:45 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. - Hon. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) decision finding that Dr. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
Aug. 9, 2022), in which Judges Lourie, Dyk, and Hughes rejected Smith’s claims in an act that is aptly described as “jumping the shark. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
Aug. 9, 2022), in which Judges Lourie, Dyk, and Hughes rejected Smith’s claims in an act that is aptly described as “jumping the shark. [read post]
