Search for: "IN RE JUDGE ANONYMOUS" Results 341 - 360 of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2021, 3:38 am
In re Pfanner Schutzbekleidung GmbH, Application Serial No. 79247130 (August 5, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:32 am by Christine Corcos
” Please upload your Haiku in Word format and without your identifying information, as we will judge the Haikus anonymously. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 2:11 pm by Steve Armstrong
"I know these guys but don't understand why they're using my name. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:23 pm
"I know these guys but don't understand why they're using my name. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 9:26 am
I don't mind bar codes, at least when they're on books, boxes, and bags of sugar. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:50 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
The judge already expressed skepticism of any evidence relying on anonymous hearsay — that is, information a witness does not have personal knowledge of, including things they heard second- and third-hand from others. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:18 pm by Mark Herrmann
(Perhaps it’s because they’re not anonymous.) [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm by Venkat
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with some comments by Eric] In re: sec. 2703(d) Order; 10GJ3793; Miscellaneous Case No. 1:11dm00003 (E.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm by Guest Author
That case, as Judge Richard Posner wrote in 1985 “has long been regarded as authoritative,” United Airlines v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:47 pm
| Public Knowledge: We're now accepting nominations for our annual IP3 Awards. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:09 am
. _________ Gratitude note:  Thanks to Blawg Review's anonymous Ed. for listing this as a blog judges might want to read (some already do, and they give me wonderful feedback), and to Evan Schaeffer at Illinois Trial Practice Weblog for sending his many (many!) [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Ruth Carter
There was a case in Maryland in 2009 where a judge did not force a website to reveal the identities of anonymous commenters unless the plaintiff provided evidence to support its claims first. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 5:43 am
If you want to be able to say how much you hate the prosecutor and how stupid a judge is, then it's best to keep it anonymous because you're sure to see them again and again. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
Judges don't accept anonymous briefs. [read post]
25 May 2008, 10:32 am
Wegner: Save the outrage for the people in power, the USPTO, court judges, ones who have an impact, who should know better, the ones that, to date, you have been too afraid to take to task, because you're in the little club, and you would be ostracized if you had the courage of your convictions. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 3:53 pm
  Later on Saturday, this anonymous comment appeared to Mary's post:I would just like to ask that no one judge neither the Dr. in this case nor the family. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:52 pm by Eric
If the employee challenged the wipe in court, I would imagine many judges would be reluctant to enforce the release, motivating them to look for reasons not to do so. [read post]