Search for: "IN RE STRICKLAND"
Results 341 - 360
of 483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 2:01 am
But they're mine. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:55 pm
John Kasich (R, B) ousts Ted Strickland (D, A+). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:42 pm
Governor Strickland gets credit for creating an Energy Advisor position. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:32 am
” Thomas — “…” So yeah, we’re calling it 6-3. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
I don’t know when or why the Department removed these pages, but let’s assume Nichols’ murder has inspired the department to re-examine its approach to force.This of course would be a good thing; it is better to have good rules than bad. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:56 am
"This execution team has demonstrated clearly they're incapable (of) providing a quick and painless execution to Mr. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:21 am
A heartfelt "sorry" as they push the plunger isn't quite what Strickland had in mind. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Strickland, 640 F.2d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 1981); In re Horob, 54 B.R. 693, 696 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:04 pm
” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. . . . [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
You’re dictated to by others or live in a miserable state. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
But they're victimless only in that sense. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
And given how long they’ve been pending, we’re due for more opinions soon. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:50 am
If you're skeptical the U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 8:25 pm
” Kass: “Given the investigations that are going on now, if you’re elected president . [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
Strickland said “Mandatory recognition of claims in which success for a minority depends upon crossover majority voters would create serious tension with the third Gingles requirement…”. [read post]
