Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. R. R., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 341 - 360 of 2,439
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 5:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
Since international abduction [and] wrongful retention of [a] child[ ] is harmful to [his or her] well-being,’ a TRO in this case will serve the public interest by protecting the childs well-being. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:34 am by Aaron Weems
The mothers argument is that football represents a “status quo,” but the father’s counsel argued that the status quo changed once the second and third concussion occurred from football. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
A married woman who gave birth was deemed the legal mother, and her husband was presumed to be the childs father. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:24 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Rogers quote “When I was a boy and I would see scary things in the news, my mother would say to me, ‘Look for the helpers. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm by Giles Peaker
He has an interesting history, of which some highlights are: Evicting tenants (including single mothers or ‘battered wives’) because they were on housing benefit or ‘likely to result in property damage’. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm by Mark Ashton
  In so doing it decided that: (1) Pennsylvania was the habitual residence based upon the childs testimony; and, (2) Mothers retention was not wrongful. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Yet if that same father, or T’s mother and Mr JM are prosecuted on the same facts which justified a non-molestation order, the prosecution would be public and the names of the adults open to the press to publicise, with the childs name anonymous. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:56 am by MBettman
 The Court held that under its existing precedent, the test in a name change case is the best interest of the child, which in this case was to keep the mothers name. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 3:16 pm by Joel R. Brandes
” The Release further provided that petitioner “designate[s] [respondent] Johnny Antonio Luna as a qualified and adequate adult competent to perform any proceedings to retain the girl if [her] rights as mother are terminated. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
(iv) Lady Hale Gravitating towards a more child-focussed approach, her Ladyship’s judgment struck a more philosophical chord than Lord Carnwath’s mechanical dissection of pure law. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court did not release Jamie J. into her mother's custody when it dismissed the article 10 neglect petition. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Paxton, the court held that Texas cannot enforce its new ban on the most common method of second-trimester abortion—dilation and evacuation (D&E) without in utero demise—because doing so imposed an undue burden on the abortion right.What’s interesting about this case is not that the State of Texas lost. [read post]
Smith, SCOTUS held that a state rule requiring a childs birth certificate to list the non-biological father if he is married to the biological mother but that does not allow both same-sex spouses to be listed as parents is unconstitutional discrimination in violation of Obergefell v. [read post]