Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. B., A CHILD" Results 341 - 360 of 2,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
One nun was excommunicated, and her hospital lost its Catholic status because they faced a situation in which “[b]oth mother and fetus were dying” and “[o]nly the mother’s life could be saved. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:24 pm by Jonathan Pyzer
Also, if you ever have to deal with family law or child custody issues, a judge can consider your criminal record as evidence of your character. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:36 am by Barsumian Armiger
The CWDS specifically states who may bring an action under the CWDS in subsection (c): (1) the father and mother jointly, or either of them by naming the other parent as a codefendant to answer as to his or her interest, (2) the person to whom custody of the child was awarded in the case of divorce or dissolution of marriage (with the Indiana Court of Appeals noting in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:33 pm by Emily Dai
Racine, attorney general for the District of Columbia; Barry C. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 5:26 am by Russell Knight
“The court shall allocate parenting time according to the child’s best interests. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:25 am by David Post
Thus, for example, we may ask [a] whether the rule has proved to be intolerable simply in defying practical workability; [b] whether the rule is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequences of overruling and add inequity to the cost of repudiation; [c] whether related principles of law have so far developed as to have left the old rule no more than a remnant of abandoned doctrine; or [d] whether facts have so changed or come to be seen so… [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 8:06 am by familoo
It is in my client’s, and their child’s best interests. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Therefore, no hearing on the validity of process of service was necessary and the Family Court should not have dismissed the petition.Although the mother did not specifically seek an upward modification based on an increase in the father’s income by 15% or more, it was proper to modify the father’s child support obligation on this basis, as the parties declined to opt out of Family Court Act § 451(3)(b). [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Strathdee appeals as of right to this Court under s. 691(2)(b) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Deane, Dawson & Gaudon JJ stated at [17] as to the parenting presumptions: “The presumptions operate in the interests of the child and provide the basis for the imposition of parental duties and a responsibility unless and until proved to the contrary is forthcoming. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Deane, Dawson & Gaudon JJ stated at [17] as to the parenting presumptions: “The presumptions operate in the interests of the child and provide the basis for the imposition of parental duties and a responsibility unless and until proved to the contrary is forthcoming. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 11:17 am by Russell Knight
“The court shall allocate decision-making responsibilities according to the child’s best interests” 750 ILCS 602.5(a) “In determining the child’s best interests for purposes of allocating significant decision-making responsibilities, the court shall consider all relevant factors, including the physical violence or threat of physical violence by the child’s parent directed against the child” 750 ILCS… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
I may also offer (c) some normative suggestions about what should be done. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Now family violence is legally relevant to the determination of a child’s best interests (s.16), and it is relevant to what dispute resolution process a lawyer advises their client to try (s.7.7). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Jan von Hein
German law offers an interesting option for States to defend themselves against new intra-EU investment arbitration cases. [read post]