Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD"
Results 341 - 360
of 837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 4:20 am
P. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
Anonymity has been granted to soldiers who were called as witnesses at the ‘Bloody Sunday’ inquiry (R v Lord Saville, ex p. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
His reliance on R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:22 pm
The Court of Appeal, in the sole judgment of Lord Justice Wilson, found that Sidhu could not be accommodated with the later judgments in Puhlhofer v Hillingdon LBC [1986] AC 484 and R v Brent LBC ex p Awua [1996] 1 AC 55. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:58 am
First, they suffer the loss of a child or other family member. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè; A-tún-orí-tí-kò… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:41 pm
In re Silvia R., 159 Cal. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:10 pm
The Judge considered the leading authority on the common law principles applicable to the anonymization of victims in blackmail cases: R v Socialist Worker Printers and Publishers Ltd ex p. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
[An interesting court opinion, though I think on balance mistaken.] [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:52 am
R. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:05 am
" Slip Op at p. 11. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
Below are a few of the recent decisions that I found interesting. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 4:08 pm
In a May 23 ruling, Honorable Paul P. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
’ (Olguin, at p. 384.) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:45 am
It seeks $250 million because Amazon chief executive Jeffrey P. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm
For very serious offences, s. 42(2)(r) of the YCJA permits the imposition of an IRCS order as part of a youth sentence. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
R. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
In Democracy the idealistic and hyper-principled heroine, Madeleine Lee is courted by the far more practical and ambitious Senator Silas P. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
., Nov. 15, 2013, p.40, addresses the rarely litigated issue of constructive abandonment (i.e., a spouse’s unjustified refusal to engage in sexual relations) as a basis for disqualifying a surviving spouse from receiving an elective share. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
While the sheriff presiding over the P H P case found that the accused’s ECHR, art 8 rights were not engaged, he determined that the evidence in question was nonetheless inadmissible. [read post]
