Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF J. A. C."
Results 341 - 360
of 5,592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
We are happy to support the winning team, no matter how short-lived the victory might be. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
However, the generally accepted formulation of the test was by Grandpré J. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
J. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
Meta has announced that will test blocking news sharing in Canada on its platforms Facebook and Instagram in response to Bill C-18’s system of mandated payments for links. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 10:45 am
Timmons and Melissa J. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
” The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had "affirmed the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of an action filed by the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that California’s Proposition 12 violates the dormant Commerce Clause in banning the sale of whole pork meat (no matter where produced) from animals confined in a manner inconsistent with California… [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
” The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had "affirmed the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of an action filed by the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that California’s Proposition 12 violates the dormant Commerce Clause in banning the sale of whole pork meat (no matter where produced) from animals confined in a manner inconsistent with California… [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm
At issue – and it is nice to have a Court of Appeal matter that is simply on a single point of law – was whether shared ownership leases where the lessee has a less than 100% share were long leases, and so qualifying tenants for the purposes of section 76 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:04 pm
Yates (supra) in the words quoted above and would apply to a case such as a title covering a whole page of original matter, or something of that nature, but would not justify such a wide extension of copyright as the appellant company has contended for, or the holding of McEvoy J. on this point. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
Constable J rejected the argument that Groups A and B (representing the Church of England) were designed to represent faith groups while Groups C (representing teachers) and D (representing the local authority) were designed to be secular [65]. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:00 am
Fourth, variance matters. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of Patrick J. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of Patrick J. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
If omissions could be held liable in the absence of an independent duty to act, then there would be no limiting principle to prevent the application of liability far beyond what anyone (except for the cop in the final episode of Seinfeld) would believe reasonable: [I]f aiding-and-abetting liability were taken too far, then ordinary merchants could become liable for any misuse of their goods and services, no matter how attenuated their relationship with the wrongdoer. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Some reimbursement payments were made from the Donald J. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
Last week in the courts On 15 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The President has to keep the pressure on Republicans to relent, which means that he has to keep everyone in suspense about what he will do if (or as seems increasingly likely when) they refuse to budge.The Strategy Now: Brace for Blowback No Matter What Biden DoesOr maybe not. [read post]
20 May 2023, 6:29 am
Many pharma patents, particularly substance patents, are classified in IPC main class C. [read post]
17 May 2023, 10:31 am
Hilty, Andrzej Jakubowski, Marie-Christine Janssens, Bernd Justin Jütte, Stavroula Karapapa, Jessica C. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am
The Court of Appeals explained that the “matter [came to it] on a motion to dismiss, not a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
