Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF FORTH"
Results 341 - 360
of 478
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 9:00 am
Randle, 11-2962 (decision May 14, 2012), reinstated several inmate claims that a district court [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:03 am
It argued in particular that whether or not to deprive a group of people – convicted prisoners serving sentences – of the right to vote fell within the margin of appreciation afforded to the member States in the matter. [...] 95. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:00 am
Early reinstatement is possible if certain criteria are satisfied. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:16 pm
Section (1)(D) of Article 30 contains an exception from the grievance procedure for certain disciplinary matters that are subject to the Local Government Code: Disciplinary matters subject to the appeals procedure provided by Texas Local Government Code Chapter 143 shall not be subject to the grievance/arbitration procedure; provided that such matters, at the employee's election, will be subject to the Civil Service Commission or grievance/arbitration procedure under a… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:16 pm
Section (1)(D) of Article 30 contains an exception from the grievance procedure for certain disciplinary matters that are subject to the Local Government Code: Disciplinary matters subject to the appeals procedure provided by Texas Local Government Code Chapter 143 shall not be subject to the grievance/arbitration procedure; provided that such matters, at the employee's election, will be subject to the Civil Service Commission or grievance/arbitration procedure under… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
The settlement agreement set forth a comprehensive division of marital property. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
The settlement agreement set forth a comprehensive division of marital property. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:23 pm
It may well be that in connection with the estate Florida would have subject matter jurisdiction with regard to claims seeking to determine the ownership of shares of stock that the father undertook in the validated will to bestow to the stepmother. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 7:39 pm
” The plaintiffs failed, however, to set forth specific facts that would support of a reasonable inference that: (1) the children were actually unavailable and (2) the defendants knew they were unavailable. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 8:22 pm
There were also attempts to settle the matter. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
Long-termPermanent alimony may be awarded following a marriage of long duration if such an award is appropriate upon consideration of the factors set forth in subsection (2), following a marriage of moderate duration if such an award is appropriate based upon clear and convincing evidence after consideration of the factors set forth in subsection (2), or following a marriage of short duration if there are written findings of exceptional circumstances. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:22 am
Things change, minds change, Bar standards tighten, but if nothing this man did for the last 18 years matters to the Board or the Supreme Court, then the concept of redemption doesn't exist.The issue for reinstatement is both what is disqualifying (disbarment) and whether there is sufficient evidence of rehabilitation. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
The Superior Court concluded that the Board of Rights' findings were not supported by the weight of the evidence, granted the petition, and ordered Joaquin reinstated. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:27 am
As members of this community, it truly is your input that matters most, so I do sincerely appreciate all of it. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
It’s not, and it wouldn’t really matter if it were; as the court explains in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
The response is that Crawford actually reinstates the proper understanding of the Clause, from which the Court departed in Ohio v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
Do you think that difference matters in terms of outcomes? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:27 pm
The name of the person who signs a document filed in connection with an application, registration, or Board proceeding must be set forth in printed or typed form immediately below or adjacent to the signature, or identified elsewhere in the filing, or the Office may require that it be stated for the record. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
* Joe Mullin is blogging again on patent matters, especially NPE issues! [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:04 pm
The Administrative Law Judge hearing the matter, Arthur J. [read post]
