Search for: "INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS"
Results 341 - 360
of 507
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 9:06 am
In that case the jury found for the defendant on direct infringement, for Soverain on indirect and $2.5 million in damages. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
In fact, ADR has been criticized as providing “second-class justice. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 11:20 am
Similarly, to establish a claim of discrimination by indirect evidence, a plaintiff will have to show that (1) he is a member of a protected class; (2) he is qualified for the position; (3) he suffered an adverse employment action; and (4) he was replaced by a person outside his protected class, or was treated less favorably than a similarly-situated individual outside his protected class. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Trial Complexities in Antitrust Cases following Clayworth: Competing Views of Different Plaintiffs’ Groups and Defendants This panel will discuss strategic and procedural complexities and opportunities when antitrust claims brought by a class of direct purchasers, by a class of indirect purchasers, direct action plaintiffs (i.e., opt outs) and/or by State Attorneys General are on the brink of trial and the parties and the court are wrestling… [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm
Under the terms of the proposed settlements, Cadbury will pay $1.3 million into a fund that will be used to pay expenses of the direct purchaser plaintiffs, $250,000 to be paid to indirect purchasers for resale, and $250,000 to be used to pay for class notice and administration. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
The trial judge found that the soil on the properties of the class members (“claimants”), as represented by the plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:44 am
• A private action for damages can, under certain facts, be brought under the OSEA if a four part test is met: 1) defendant violated the statute; 2) plaintiff was injured as a result of the violation; 3) plaintiff was a member of class protected by the statute; and 4) plaintiff suffered type of injury against which the statute protected. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
Ct. 1937, 2009-2 Trade Cases ¶76,785).The plaintiffs were not required to plead detailed, defendant-by-defendant allegations. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Defense lawyers contend that comment k promises pharmaceutical companies total and complete immunity from all potential theories of liability except for a narrow class of “failure to warn” claims. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Plaintiff claims inadmissible – obiter dictum judgment on merits concludes patent valid and infringed: Welvaarts Weegsystemen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Plaintiff claims inadmissible – obiter dictum judgment on merits concludes patent valid and infringed: Welvaarts Weegsystemen v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm
The panel held that the fee award so dwarfed the (indirect) relief for the class that it called for closer study by the district court. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
They are neither paid to the providers on the plaintiff’s behalf nor paid to the plaintiff in indemnity of his or her expenses. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(Docket Report) District Court W D Tennessee: Twombly and Iqbal, not Form 18, dictate pleading standard for indirect infringement: Asentinel LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:51 am
In granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court focused on definitional inconsistencies in the complaints of the plaintiffs, who include a putative class of direct purchasers and indirect purchasers of ODDs and ODD Products. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
But consider what happened in the securities fraud class action arena. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
In determining whether a plaintiff class should be certified, courts cannot take the allegations in an antitrust plaintiff's complaint at face value if defendants have presented contrary evidence. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:27 am
The court also dismissed a host of state claims against Google, and has yet to decide whether to certify a class of plaintiffs complaining Google breached their privacy. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Plaintiffs have not bought or sold a good or service, nor have they manufactured, distributed, or consumed a commodity.Third, in the crucial move, he asks whether this class of activities is “economic” as it must be under Lopez and Morrison and concludes that it is not.In the government’s view, plaintiffs’ financial planning choices and position on risk are quintessentially economic in nature because they inevitably lead to cost-shifting when the… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
indirect? [read post]
