Search for: "Imperial v. Imperial" Results 341 - 360 of 934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2020, 3:30 am by Anders Walker
M’Intosh that delegitimized Indian sovereignty claims and Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Intervenor-Appellees in the case are the seven Colorado River Basin States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming; the Colorado River Commission of Nevada; the Southern Nevada Water Authority; the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association; the Central Arizona Water Conservation District; the Imperial Irrigation District; and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (collectively, Intervenors). [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "An action dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3216 may be restored only if the plaintiff can demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default in complying with the 90-day notice and a meritorious cause of action (see Picot v City of New York, 50 AD3d 757; Sapir v Krause, Inc., 8 AD3d 356, 356-357; Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190, 197). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Like Jon Connolly and Liz Thornberry, I am tracing law and legalities in a British imperial setting. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce that the plaintiffs failed to obtain the required leave to proceed with the action within the three-year period mandated by the Ontario Securities Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:56 am by Lisa Stam
  To this extent, my conclusions differ from those of Lax J. in Fresco v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, [2009] OJ No. 2531 ("Fresco"), who declined to certify a claim for overtime by employees of the CIBC. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Imperial Oil Ltd. and sometimes this rule is referred to as the rule in Commonwealth Construction Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:05 pm
In October, Mitts sent an imperious response admonishing Brooks not to “micromanage” the case from prison. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
  If a survey is justified and permission granted, a party could also do much worse than to ensure compliance with the "Whitford guidelines" set out in the seminal case Imperial Group plc & Another v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Oman, Natural Law and the Rhetoric of Empire: Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 8:20 pm
But even if it's substantial, who's to say that an imperial OCC would not keep trying to expand its authority, Watters v. [read post]