Search for: "In Re Adoption of Children by F."
Results 341 - 360
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2011, 8:16 am
Board meetings are not social events, they’re business meetings. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
On June 30, 2011, the Court adopted sweeping new rules about what information can and can't be put in the court file. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
On June 30, 2011, the Court adopted sweeping new rules about what information can and can't be put in the court file. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm
The 3d DCA ruled that the post-divorce ownership of his deferred comp' plan = ex wife didn't get the money unless husband re-affirmed his intent to benefit her post-divorce (which he hadn't, he'd done nothing). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
It seems his argument can be summarized as “f*** kids. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
We're serious about this business. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
Relying on the First Circuit’s opinion in In re Kane, 254 F.3d 325, 331 (1st Cir. 2001), the court adopted factors to determine what constitutes extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Dupont Hospital for Children, 393 Fed. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:51 am
(quoting In re Bates, CA 122-89, High Court of Justice, Family Div'l Ct. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:10 pm
Wife filed three OSC re Contempts against the Husband, including one in which the Court in August, 2006, ordered the parties to meet and confer in a 4-way, as to which Ken "refused to meet and confer if attorney Andrew G. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Dudas, 536 F.3d 1330, 2008.) 104 Nw. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
The Friedrich court was referring to In Re Bates, High Court of Justice, Family Division, Royal Courts of London, No. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm
At a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.27 hearing, both mother and father submitted on the recommendation to terminate their parental rights and the court selected adoption as the children’s permanent plan. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
The question of lawfulness and statutory purpose Lord Dyson, giving the lead judgment for the majority, adopted the view that detention must be for the statutory purposes of making or implementing a deportation order and for no other purpose. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
A person cannot simply decide not to pay his income taxes, or not bother to send his/her children to school (where the law requires sending them), or not to obey a policeman’s order to put down one’s gun.Thus, according to the Court since omissions are not crimes, and since passive euthanasia is an omission, there is no criminal prohibition against it. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:24 am
(Adoption of Allison C. (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1004, 1011.) [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:37 am
Under the Child Placement Act, “the Division is obliged, on its own and even in the absence of an application by a sibling, to insure and facilitate such visitation under N.J.S.A. 9:6B-4(f), up until the time that an adoption is finalized. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:45 am
Mason and his cohorts aren’t interested in continuing the conversation and the landlord even says to me “F***k off mate, we’re busy”. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
Zick (In re Zick), 931 F.2d 1124, 1126 (6th Cir. 1991) ("A bankruptcy court decision to dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
