Search for: "In Re Application of Smith"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Obama, EFF Explains Why Metadata Matters and the Third-Party Doctrine Doesn’t (EFF) NSA Spying (EFF’s landing page re NSA spying and their use of metadata) EFF cases in relation to NSA spying and metadata in order of file date: Hepting v AT&T Jewel v NSA First Unitarian v NSA Smith v Obama Win! [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
" The subcommittee will hear testimony from Patricia Hastings, the chief consultant for post deployment health services at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and David Smith, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for health readiness. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 10:32 am
Smith, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, which “cut back sharply” on free exercise by establishing that religious groups are usually not entitled to faith-based exemptions from neutral, generally applicable laws. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
If you want to worship and you're the 51st person in line, sorry, you are out of luck. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
But we're not, and we're doing that on purpose. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:07 pm
There does not appear to be much appetite for overruling the landmark Smith decision, notwithstanding the fact that the Court granted cert on that question. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
So, if you're right about that, why should we even entertain the question whether to overrule Smith? [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:46 am
Mr Barty Smith and the respondent objected to this application. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
* * * *As the Court explained in Lukumi, and as the SG himself acknowledges in his brief in Fulton, not all exceptions or anomalous applications foreclose a rule's "general applicability" for Free Exercise purposes. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
MOOPPAN: So we're not denying the significance of that interest in the abstract. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
They just didn’t care and figured they would get away with it because they’re the screws. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
Leiza Dolghih is a Labor and Employment Board Certified partner at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP in Dallas, Texas and a Co-Chair of the firm’s Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Disputes national practice. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 14 to 16 October 2020 Saini J heard an application to set aside service out in the case of Qatar Airways v Middle East News. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm
Lawyers are bound to the Rules if they engage in law-related work for clients such as accounting, financial planning, title services, etc. that aren’t clearly distinguished from practice; if, however, they’re operating entirely separately and that’s clear to the client, then the Rules applicable only to law practice don’t apply. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 12:34 pm
So You’re Saying We Should Start Charging This? [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:25 am
Chien, Piloting Applicant-Initiated 101 Deferral Through A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2019 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (2019.Chien.DeferringPSM) David A. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
But Not Everyone Thinks They’re Broken. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Adam Smith, Esq. covers the new initiative by our friend Phil Flora and Leopard Solutions on ranking law firms by their vitality and resilience, not just once a year, but in real-time. [read post]
