Search for: "In Re Blair" Results 341 - 360 of 608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2011, 8:01 am by Alex Aldridge
”Cherie Blair QCIn response, Cherie Blair QC, the former Prime Minister’s wife and a distinguished lawyer, issued a warning: “By losing their financial independence, [women] become very vulnerable to loss of their wealthy husbands whether through divorce, sickness or death. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Adam Wagner
”Lose the note cards next time”, he tells Cleve, “your job is to say into that bullhorn what they’re all feeling”. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by INFORRM
” and “Carole’s £1m question: Will she tell all about Blairs’ tax secrets? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:33 am by Kim Zetter
“The National Security Agency has the greatest repository of cybertalent,” Blair said. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
 The Blair/Bush argument for the invasion's legality was very weak (as I noted at the time), but it was enough of a fig-leaf to provide some legal cover for the Iraq invasion. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  University of Georgia field goal kicker Blair Walsh eats a miniature box of Raisin Bran in the locker room before every game. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 4:33 pm by Jeralyn
Blair tells me the Hall of Fame award is a huge deal and would mean the world to Ed. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am by Hull and Hull LLP
You’re listening to episode #237 on Tuesday, February 1st, 2011. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:03 pm by KC Johnson
In an expected move, Crystal Mangum will not be re-tried on the most serious arson charge that she faced. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:59 pm by Charon QC
Ming Campbell expressed the view that even, at this late stage, the matter should be re-considered by the Cabinet Secretary. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 1:40 pm
The standard of living a claimant ought to have had or which he or she has become accustomed as facilitated by the testator, may influence the degree of a testator’s moral obligation: Re Berger, [1978] 2 E.T.R. 275 (B.C.S.C.); Mordo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Steve Lombardi
Enough said; if you’re injured by one give me a call and we can talk about your legal rights. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:54 pm by Matthew Flinn
In relation to the first point, Blair J had decided that even if he had found a breach of Article 5(4), no compensation was payable. [read post]