Search for: "In Re Doe, III" Results 341 - 360 of 4,723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
In an article in the Wyoming Law Review, Keke Jason Stark, a professor at the Alexander Blewitt III School of Law at the University of Montana, and his coauthors, detail the legal history of Indigenous rights to Yellowstone National Park. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Doe, involving whether a state court clerk was properly denied quasi-judicial immunity for telling a pregnant minor, Jane Doe, that her parents would be informed if she tried to obtain a judicial bypass to get an abortion without parental consent. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
But that does not imply that the prosecution will be a slam dunk or that Trump does not have defenses on which prosecutors have not yet fully focused. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In a potentially precedent-setting case, 11 directors of global energy company Shell Plc (formerly Royal Dutch Shell Plc) [1] are being sued in their personal capacity over the company’s energy transition strategy. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am by bndmorris
Re, Personal Precedent at the Supreme Court, 136 Harv. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by Ambassador Thomas Graham Jr.
The path to world war, however, may not be obvious, even when we’re right on it. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:09 am by Dennis Crouch
But after casting doubt on the Fullam doctrine in In re Fuetterer, 319 F.2d 259 (CCPA 1963)[2], the CCPA settled the issue conclusively in favor of such claims in In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210 (CCPA 1971). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:59 am by sim1koh2
If the controlled substance is a Schedule III controlled substance, the penalty is typically a fine and/or community service. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
Internally, the M16 has components for automatic fire and the AR-15 does not. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am by Peter J. Sluka
LLC, 157 AD3d 190, 194 [1st Dept 2017] [derivative claims]; In re Carlisle Etcetera LLC, 114 A3d 592, 597 [Del Ch 2015] [dissolution]). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Hard to do without statutory change. 1A and Article III standing are there, but worrisome; casualness over stare decisis does suggest courts are willing to look at things from scratch—Vintage Brands; Netchoice—everything might be up for grabs. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
Dep’t of Justice, Re: Amenability of the President, Vice President and Other Civil Officers to Federal Criminal Prosecution While in Office, at 36 (Sept. 24, 1973) (“With respect to his responsibility as tie breaker his immunity from prosecution should be analogized to that of Members of Congress under Article I, section 6, clause 1 of the Constitution. [read post]