Search for: "In Re NB" Results 341 - 360 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 10:36 am by LindaMBeale
  We're considering planting some troublemakers" :  Walker says "We thought about that". [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 11:57 pm by Tessa Shepperson
NB There is a useful information page, from the point of view of the defendant, on the CAB website here. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
NB: All articles and rules referred to hereafter correspond to the EPC 1973.Electronic Filing[1.2] The pertinent provisions are those set out in the Decision of the President of the European Patent Office dated 29 October 2002 (OJ EPO 2002, 543) and the related Notice from the EPO concerning the electronic filing of documents within the meaning of R 36 dated 3 December 2003 (OJ EPO 2003, 609). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Ron Coleman
But, quick and dirty:  They’re very passionate about their creative work, as you’d guess. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:55 pm by John Ross
" (NB: The Supreme Court will consider this question next term). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:05 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
” “Parents’ Lawsuit Against Apple for In-App Purchases by Minor Children Moves Forward — In re Apple In-App Purchase Litigation. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Susan Brenner
As I explained in a post I did a while back, law enforcement officers (assisted, for a while, by NBS’s Chris Hansen) often run “sting” operations that are designed to catch predators. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The applicant was also informed that if the missing drawings were filed in due time, the application would be re-dated to the date on which they were filed (R 56(2));the application would not be re-dated if it claimed priority of an earlier application and it was requested to maintain the original filing date, provided the requirements under R 56(3) were fulfilled; if the missing drawings were not filed in due time, according to R 56(4), any reference to the missing drawings would… [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am by Raymond Wee Hock Tan
Here is the English and Hanyu Pinyin version of the speech.Talk to Chinese Chambers members re migrationI grew up in Singapore, the ninth child in a family of ten. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm by familoo
(see Re H-L (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 655 para 3] Or, if you find you respond better to jaunty mantras; as the President says ‘ If in doubt, do without! [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
These Patent Office patent application rejections require inventors to continually re-submit their patent application and pay thousands in additional government filing fees, before their patent application are ultimately turned down. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:12 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Photo credit: internet connect hyperlink // ShutterStock Earlier this week, we posted about a Seventh Circuit case where an ambiguous user call-to-action undermined an online contract formation procecss. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If what you’re doing is likely to stay under the radar/not make much money, don’t ask permission. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is an appeal of the opponent against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the opposed patent in amended form. [read post]