Search for: "In Re NB"
Results 341 - 360
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2009, 4:05 pm
NB : This decision has also been discussed here (in French). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
However, the present situation is not comparable, so that re-establishment is not excluded. [11]Considering the particular circumstances, i.e. the close temporal connection of the application under consideration and the proceedings concerning [a parallel] application [by the same applicant], the facts of the procedural situation being oriented in the same way (gleichgelagert), and taking into consideration the procedural errors which the EPO made in this parallel application [NB :… [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:27 pm
At least we know you're reading the blog. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:04 pm
[NB: Payment made to insiders that are incentive payments are permitted -- see In re Nellson Nutraceutical, 369 B.R. 787 (Bankr. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:02 am
You have to hire this Firm.Begging the question - unless you're Bilzin - why is no one talking about this? [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 3:11 am
Six, including mine (the Landlord Law Blog, in case you have forgotten, the one you're reading now). [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
In re Peter S. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
NB: the fact that plaintiffs offer dial-up services is interesting! [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
In these parts, he was known only by his first name, the way you can refer to "Michael" when you're discussing basketball and people know you mean Michael Jordan. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:55 am
One Valerie Laws (NB) wrote these words on the backs of sheep, one per beast: CLOUDS GRAZE THE SKY; BELOW, SHEEP DRIFT GENTLE OVER FIELDS, SOFT MIRRORS, WARM WHITE SNOW. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 10:32 pm
(It could be clearer obviously, but you can go back and re-write any agreement in terms of a dispute that later arises.) [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:03 pm
"(NB: I had to add the "one-time" bit because they already offer an on-going "package" discount)So why would one phrase give me the warm fuzzies, and a simple re-wording send me through the roof? [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
NB: All names and situations altered to protect my own and my "opponents'" anonymity and to honor the confidential nature of the mediation. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:28 am
If you're thinking hundreds of thousands and the client is thinking $50,000, its qualifies as really darn important to clear that up before undertaking the engagement, lest you start down a road destined for failure. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 3:23 pm
NB: it's worth listening to the audio whether or not you're interested in the case. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
Conservative commentators were fretting over the re-imposition, while liberals were complaining that the conservatives were making up issues. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 9:15 am
Ideally the use of codicils should try and be avoided, as current technology should permit making the necessary changes on a computer and simply re-printing the Will. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
We’re very much in uncharted waters. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
"If you take the money away, they're going to take the cameras down and illustrate which cities are in it for the money," Eyman said. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:49 am
While the Conservative decision to include the re-introduction of C-61 in its platform makes it unlikely that many (or any) of its candidates will support the copyright pledge, interest from Liberal and New Democrat candidates continues to grow (the Green party already committed as a party). [read post]
