Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc."
Results 341 - 360
of 987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:12 am
Throughout the opinion, repeatedly and consistently, the Supreme Court referred to “loan or lease” payments, “costs of a car loan or lease,” or “loan or lease costs;” nowhere did the Court state that, to qualify for the deduction, payments had to be a purchase-money debt. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:16 am
Last night, in a case that produced four opinions from the seven-member Court, a sharply divided Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment in Hooker v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
They’re subtweeting the US Olympic Committee for telling them not to tweet about the Olympics. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:14 am
” (I expect that this line from the opinion is one that will likely upset members of the Supreme Court because it is ridiculous.). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
—>Kully sued to block the court-supervised sale of the Orange County Register to Tribune Publishing in a bankruptcy auction. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
And this isn't just a hypothetical: the Supreme Court grants certiorari (or adds) particular issues all the time, and the dissenting justices on the Court have never (in my mind) said in response that since they disagree with that order, they're going to refuse to follow it. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:52 pm
That is an opinion. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 1:55 pm
However, the state supreme court reversed. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:28 am
And Presiding Judge Keller seems to have a much deeper understanding of First Amendment law than anyone else on the court, leading to some interesting pro-defense opinions when it came to the constitutionality of offenses like "online solicitation of a minor," etc.. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
Why This Case is Important: The Court of Chancery opinion in Obeid v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
But then the SCt said unconditionally that pharma ads were commercial speech subject to different levels of scrutiny depending on what opinion you’re looking at. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
To this end, we will consider some of the following questions: What impact has the Supreme Court’s eBay opinion had (and what impact should it have) on the availability of injunctive relief in trademark suits? [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
The Supreme People's Court interpretations serve as guidelines for applying the statutes, sort of but not quite like not precedent, but with a similar disciplining objective (e.g., here). [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
The California Supreme Court says no. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:25 am
In Re H.E.B. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am
” The more you don’t know, the more you’re allowed to do. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm
Look how they’re defined in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:15 am
Fortunately, we have Supreme Court precedent on our side: City of Ladue v. [read post]
