Search for: "In Re SJ"
Results 341 - 360
of 487
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 2:30 am
Supreme Court Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 17 (2 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2012] EWCA Civ 501 (02 May 2012) ConvaTec Ltd & Ors v Smith & Nephew Healthcare Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 520 (02 May 2012) Kizhakudan v Secretary of State for Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 566 (02 May 2012) Birmingham City Council v Akhtar & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 585 (02 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
According to the statement in open court, the claimant sued for libel over an allegation in The History of the NME by Pat Long, published in February 2012: “The book included a passage that re-told an incident in 1977 when Mark Williams, a candidate for the position of [NME] editor, was arrested for drug possession. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
In Europe, for example, they’re considering revising their version of functionality, and it’s bubbling in the US too. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:06 pm
Backstory: SJ Properties Suites v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:58 am
This is an OK standard but it is slightly different from other recent articulations of contributory trademark infringement, and I'm not sure why this panel felt the need to re-express the test in its own words. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:01 am
SJ bought a new Prius. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:53 am
SJ Mercury News: Pinterest, not Facebook, is Silicon Valley’s hottest social network. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
Journalism and the PCC This section may need to be re-titled. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
The answer to that submission is in my opinion to be found in para. 34 of Lord Steyn’s speech in In Re S (a child) [2005] 1 AC 593: such a programme will indeed be ‘very much disembodied’ and have a substantially lesser impact upon its audience. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:30 am
We also welcome suggestions from readers on cases or topics which we should be covering and suggestions for re-posts or new links on our home page. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
If your boss is bullying you, it’s not because ‘that’s how nationals work’ or ‘you’re in the big leagues now‘. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:46 am
This lawyer rammed it down my throat by trying to use SJ as part of his marketing scheme and begging for attention. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:02 pm
Ideally, the Courts would publish all of their records online, in bulk, in order to allow any private party to index and re-host all of the documents, or to build new innovative services on top of the data. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 4:11 am
SJ posts are off limits. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
Some limits exist though, so departing lawyers have to make sure they're playing by the rules. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:10 am
They're real people with real interests at risk. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:23 am
They're morons. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:00 pm
The acquisition by Google of Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion (thanks, SJ, for the typo-catching) in cash in August, 2012. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
In the past 3 years I have tried a pedagogical experiment in first year civil procedue that I thought I'd share, and on which I'd love feedback. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:33 am
SJ has a dear friend. [read post]
