Search for: "In The Matter of the Application of Public Law 16-1995"
Results 341 - 360
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
App. 1995); Dion v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
App. 1995); Dion v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Loudon County Public Schools, 16 Fed. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 pm
(ii) In its originalformulation, the rule is directed to application as a preliminary matter. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:19 pm
As I have explained in my paper, "Mapping the Law of WTO Accession," now posted on SSRN, the WTO routlnely demands that applicant countries agree to higher obligations than ordinary members have (i.e., applicant WTO-plus obligations). [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
Bharat Forge, (1995) 3 S.C.C. 434, and it is a pity that it was not considered in this case. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
Oil Transport Co., 659 So.2d 1141, 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Cook v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Law Serv. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
She understands that upholding the rule of law means going beyond legal theory to ensure consistent, fair, common-sense application of the law to real-world facts. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 2:12 am
The patent applicants in the Kubin case lost for obviousness: For the reasons stated above,the Board did not err in finding appellants' claims obvious as a matter of law. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
"[T]he risk of injury can be insured by the manufacturer and distributed among the public as a cost of doing business. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 5:56 am
There were things that weren't being said in the public press (although some of them have slowly been coming to be said). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
PP 13, 15-16. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 1:52 pm
The Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke Law School (“CSPD”) reported to the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 5:52 am
The Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke Law School (“CSPD”) reported to the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Turney, 138 S.W. 12, 16 (Mo. 1911)). [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
The current string of pro-preemption position FDA amicus briefs began in 1999, during the Clinton administration, in response to the burgeoning of fraud on the FDA litigation.This is all a matter of public record. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:00 am
However, in the area of IPRs, statute law is overwhelmingly important[16] in all jurisdictions, including in the Common Law jurisdiction of Hong Kong. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 12:01 pm
Id., at 15-16 and n.8. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:57 pm
Fraud generally occurs when there is intentional deception about an insurance matter to receive money or other benefits not rightfully due the perpetrator of the deception. [read post]
